cocomelon brain
A Writer Who Doesn't Understand 'Lolita,' And More Of This Week's 'One Main Character'
Every day, somebody says or does something that earns them the scorn of the internet. Here at Digg, as part of our mission to curate what the internet is talking about right now, we rounded up the main characters on Twitter from this past week and held them accountable for their actions.
Each day on twitter there is one main character. The goal is to never be it
— maple cocaine (@maplecocaine) January 3, 2019
This week, we've got an an academic who thinks not crossing the picket line is a privileged act, a TV writer who believes speeding is okay sometimes, an actor with a hot take about Marvel movies, and more.
Saturday
Sarah Liu
The character: Sarah Liu, political scientist, unprivileged academic
The plot: This summer's been all about strikes, and the American Political Science Association conference is taking place later this month in SoCal, where hotel workers are striking. Solidarity with striking works is usually seen as a noble cause — we all win together — however, this wasn't the case for Sarah Liu, an academic who was due to attend the conference.
"Those who are able to cancel — please be aware that it takes privilege to stand in complete solidarity with the workers," Liu wrote.
Those who are able to cancel - please be aware that it takes privilege to stand in complete solidarity with the workers.
— Sarah Liu (she/her) (@DrSarahLiu) August 5, 2023
The repercussion: It's hard to take this tweet seriously, but I assure you that’s how Liu meant it. Yes, the point Liu's making about financial loss is valid, but framing it as a privilege when hotel staff are striking for better remuneration was looked at as disingenuous by many people.
“privilege” is not the correct word here. yes, some people will have to make sacrifices. that’s true and there’s nothing wrong with saying so, but don’t act like only people with nothing to lose are doing it. i hate academics https://t.co/Mz0ds71JRQ
— mindy🌷 (@mindyisser) August 6, 2023
Having been a PhD student at Edi I think maybe it bears stating that ‘the ability to attend international professional events and expect full reimbursement by the uni’ would be seen as the advantaged position here by workers seeking solidarity.
— C. E. Aubin? 🍯 (@ceaubin) August 6, 2023
I always knew standing in solidarity with workers striking was a weapon of the bourgeoisie and the privileged 😂 https://t.co/2ZGrcdnIFO
— Old Man Perez (@IolaElla) August 6, 2023
the logical endpoint of privilege discourse, A+ 10/10 https://t.co/irzYzznFap
— Mo Torres (@motorresx) August 7, 2023
Thomas Bradley, a man living in his car, respected a picket line and wouldn’t cross to work at hotels on strike. Academics have a lot of talents in inventing reasons they can’t do the right thing. https://t.co/O0NgUbYsPN pic.twitter.com/9EKP16nqj1
— RoB (@xroblockx) August 7, 2023
I don’t plan on crossing a picket line, but yes, the opportunity costs of not going are potentially far higher if you’re someone more precarious than someone with tenure, I don’t get how this is at all a controversial thing to say, and I think it’s asinine to pretend it is. https://t.co/1rLZNHxRcj
— William B. Fuckley (@opinonhaver) August 6, 2023
Adwait Patil
Tuesday
@Mirandom88
The character: @Mirandom88, date enjoyer, loves a plan
The plot: We're in the age of sharing dating app screenshots, and Twitter user @Mirandom88 added to the discourse by sharing a date plan text from somebody to their partner (the text doesn't appear to be her own).
"Why aren’t all men like this?," she captioned the image, which showed a rather intense anniversary date schedule.
Why aren’t all men like this? pic.twitter.com/QLuAUAEzMG
— Lift Every Voice & Swing (@Mirandom88) August 8, 2023
The repercussion: From rock climbing, to brunch, to "Oppenheimer," with an escape room in between, people were shocked and in awe of the proposed date plan.
3 hours of rock climbing? pic.twitter.com/4QuYtNx3WS
— Dahr Cervantes (@KP1738) August 8, 2023
what would u even wear https://t.co/tJDxGDVNtY
— ♍︎ (@jhilikeye) August 8, 2023
Me in the mirror before the date: https://t.co/OJ7gtZ7N8R pic.twitter.com/LSE1bLpSlE
— Big Tia (@tiatamiaa) August 8, 2023
is he……….planning on leaving right after the trinity test? https://t.co/PFb3TqZOoe
— Jared Gilman (@realJaredGilman) August 9, 2023
Three straight hours of rock climbing + leaving Oppenheimer an hour early is insane https://t.co/cwCnUwJqSe
— Cosmonaut (Black iCarly) Marcus (@CosmonautMarcus) August 9, 2023
Three hours of rock climbing you might as well enlist in the army https://t.co/VsLOmcrsfI
— Маделейн . (@normalmadeline) August 8, 2023
Adwait Patil
Monday
Adam DeVine
The character: Adam DeVine, comedian, actor, not a fan of superhero movies
The plot: While talking to Theo Von on his podcast, actor and comedian Adam DeVine said something that was quickly turned into a dozen articles and took on a life of its own:
Adam DeVine says superhero films killed comedies
— Culture Crave 🍿 (@CultureCrave) August 7, 2023
"Marvel ruined it" pic.twitter.com/1HjMONkZLd
That’s it! They ruined it, pack it up. No more comedies. Also, check out his latest comedy, “Righteous Gemstones,” which he stars in.
The repercussion: File this entire mini-saga under the same category as "you can't be funny anymore" or "you can't make 'Blazing Saddles' today" or similarly ridiculous hot takes about comedy we've heard in recent years. While Adam DeVine's full comments are much more nuanced, Twitter isn't about the details. It's about tearing people to shreds over one quote taken out of context!
As a guy who loves movies and tv it’s cool to be in Variety but this is misleading. I like Marvel and think these movies are cool. I was saying that studios (in trying to compete with Marvel) have stopped making mid budget comedies. I miss seeing comedy in the theaters! https://t.co/a1S4GxO5W0
— ADAMDEVINE (@ADAMDEVINE) August 8, 2023
After this clarification, we understand where he's coming from. This isn't about the state of the industry, or how Hollywood no longer makes big picture comedies in the face of YouTube and TikTok and memes. It’s also not about vilifying his central point, about the all-in nature of spending on risk averse IP, or anything like that.
This is about hyperbolic statements in headlines that catch people's attention.
dude's one letter shy of fronting Maroon 5 I'd say he should just calm down
— Brandon Warne (@Brandon_Warne) August 7, 2023
— 𝙊𝙬𝙚𝙣 (@owen02_) August 7, 2023
The lack of real comedy killed comedy.
— Dan Rice (@GroundedTech) August 7, 2023
bad comedy killed comedies
— Mav (@Mavitivo) August 7, 2023
I could argue he ruined comedies by not being funny :(
— MrBeast (Parody) (@MrBeastfunny) August 7, 2023
Poor Barbie, ruined by Marvel.
— Barbatachtian Films (@ianmakesfilms) August 7, 2023
Jared Russo
Wednesday
David Simon
The character: David Simon, "The Wire" creator, NY hater
The plot: Simon got a $50 speeding ticket in NYC for zooming in a school zone, where he did 36 MPH instead of keeping to the 25 limit. He was annoyed because it was only 5:40 AM when he committed the offense, which apparently makes it fine. "Two-word clue: Yankees Suck," he concluded.
What sort of off-brand city sends me a $50 camera ticket for speeding in a school zone for racing at 36 mph in a 25 zone at -- wait for it -- 5:40 a.m. in total darkness on a morning in -- wait for it -- mid-July?
— David Simon (@AoDespair) August 9, 2023
Two-word clue: Yankees Suck.
Simon's Twitter activity is not really worth getting into — unless there's NYC transit discourse involved.
The repercussion: You know you're a dunce when the average NYC enjoyer and transit nerd both dunk on you.
Getting caught speeding at a speed that is statistically more likely to kill someone? https://t.co/SlR9UNliMk pic.twitter.com/SiJlTFnUo2
— Andrew Gounardes (@agounardes) August 9, 2023
5:40am in NYC is like 12 noon in Baltimore.
— Full Cast and Crew Podcast (@fullcastandcrew) August 9, 2023
What sort of off-brand former journalist/ hit screenwriter painfully familiar with the urban experience isn't aware that the school speed zone cameras have been on 24 hours, year round since last August? Listen to @wnyc or read @Gothamist to stay up on your local issues.
— Just your friendly neighborhood transit reporter (@s_nessen) August 9, 2023
I take issue with every word in your tweet, but I bet half the New Yorkers would have agreed with you if you didn’t say NYC is an off brand city while coming from Baltimore and that the Yankees suck. The city should triple your fine for your bad attitude.
— Mike Selick (@Mike_Selick) August 9, 2023
delete your account https://t.co/SUdjDgpXjX
— NYC DOT (@NYC_DOT) August 9, 2023
speed cameras save lives, it’s as simple as that
— sam (@sam_d_1995) August 10, 2023
you can avoid the fines by not speeding, or taking the subway. seems easy enough https://t.co/M9zS3iv0tK pic.twitter.com/NTooqQW4uq
“The Wire” season 6 is unwatchable. https://t.co/kC5FAk0Z87
— Aaron Naparstek (@Naparstek) August 10, 2023
A lot of people don’t know this but you can actually avoid these annoying speed camera tickets with one weird trick (driving the speed limit) https://t.co/aoaf4w7OnG
— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) August 9, 2023
Adwait Patil
Monday
Jeffrey Davies
The character: Jeffrey Davies, author of an article about "overrated classics," published by Book Riot
The plot: On Monday, a website called Book Riot published an article listing eight literary classics that the author believed to be overrated. One of the books included was Vladimir Nabokov's "Lolita," which tells the story of Dolores Haze, a child who is kidnapped and abused by the novel's narrator, an adult man named Humbert Humbert. The author writes that "no amount of beautiful prose should be enough to get over a premise as problematic as that of 'Lolita'."
shut up shut up shut up !!! pic.twitter.com/I0Zh6tN2Ga
— k(nick)s (@seed_oils_) August 8, 2023
The repercussion: Many expressed frustration at the list's author having missed the point of the novel: Humbert is evil, his actions despicable, and Nabokov makes this abundantly clear to the reader — there is absolutely no doubt that the story's protagonist is also its villain. Others disagreed with the writer's claim that books with disturbing content matter should not be written or read — gratuitous violence is one thing, but life can be upsetting and ugly, and addressing controversial topics does not always equate to endorsement of them.
People on Twitter also took issue with the article using a particular book cover — one featuring a young girl — to accompany the review. Nabokov made it explicitly clear that he didn't want any girls to feature on the cover of his novel, and fans of his work believe that publishers choosing such artwork, against the author's wishes, only confuses and distracts people from the true meaning of the book.
Them choosing a cover for this with an actual child on it to push the idea of how bad the book is is downright diabolical especially considering how against that Nabokov was in the first place
— kat ♱ (@albertcamslut) August 8, 2023
Nabokov: this man's obsession with a child is futile, ruinous and ultimately an exercise in nihilistic escapism
— Prozac Efron (@GaiusCymbaltar) August 9, 2023
Publishers: OK but what if we made the desire to have sex with children the main selling point?????
nabokov was a victim of CSA himself and have told several times that he didnt want little girls in the cover… not only did they disrespect his wishes but the way it’s sold and marketed throughout the years have damaged the real meaning of the book https://t.co/srRPhKsak5
— just a girl (@maidenprincesss) August 8, 2023
I will achieve utopia by throwing everyone who has ever unironically said “problematic” off a bridge
— Two Wrongs (@2WrongMakeRight) August 8, 2023
Cocomelon brain
— Hannah (@starkid_hannah) August 8, 2023
"The premise makes me uncomfortable, therefore the entire book must be bad. I am the literature understander."
— John Yoo Crushes the Testicles of Logic (@PlankySmith) August 9, 2023
media comprehension challenge(impossible)
— dominika (@DominikaMarkow6) August 8, 2023
truly do not know where we got this notion that this book is pro csa when the whole point is the beautiful prose cannot hide the horror of the content https://t.co/pdQyNU8iKG
— frankenstein’s monster apologist✨ (@maryswraith) August 9, 2023
Darcy Jimenez
———
Read the previous edition of our One Main Character column, which had a husband who thinks it's okay to trick his vegetarian wife into eating meat, a fashion TikToker with a bad take and someone who did not deserve a trip to Kyoto.